Solar Panels on North-Facing Roofs
North-facing roofs are generally not suitable for rooftop solar in the UK. Here is an honest breakdown of what the alternatives are and what generation you can realistically expect.
The honest answer: North-facing roofs generate 70–75% less electricity than south-facing roofs. In most cases, a ground-mounted system or east-west split installation will be a better investment. We will always advise you honestly about whether solar makes financial sense for your property.
Output by Roof Orientation
Based on a standard 4kW system at 35-degree pitch in the Midlands (approximately 3,800 kWh/year for south-facing):
| Orientation | Relative output | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| South | 100% | Optimal — maximum annual generation |
| South-West | 95% | Excellent — minimal reduction |
| South-East | 95% | Excellent — minimal reduction |
| West | 82% | Good — more afternoon generation |
| East | 80% | Good — more morning generation |
| North-West | 50% | Poor — significant reduction |
| North-East | 45% | Poor — significant reduction |
| North | 25% | Not recommended for roof solar |
Better Alternatives to North-Facing Roof Solar
East-West Split Installation (Recommended)
If your property has both east and west-facing roof slopes, an east-west split installation captures morning and afternoon sun, producing around 80–85% of south-facing output with excellent daily distribution.
Ground-Mounted System (Excellent)
A ground-mounted array in your garden can be positioned at any orientation and pitch. If you have suitable land, this is often the best solution for properties without a south-facing roof.
Garage or Outbuilding Roof
If your garage, workshop, or outbuilding has a south-facing roof, this is often a viable alternative to the main house roof — sometimes producing more electricity per panel.
Flat Roof with Angled Frames
Flat roofs can use mounting frames to orient panels at the optimal south-facing 35-degree angle, making them one of the most flexible installation options.
When North-Facing Panels Can Still Work
In a few specific circumstances, north-facing panels can still make financial sense:
- Very large roof area — a larger system can compensate for lower output per panel
- High electricity prices — the greater the price you are paying, the faster even reduced generation pays back
- Battery storage included — maximises every unit generated regardless of when it is produced
- Commercial application — large commercial roofs with north-facing sections can still be viable as part of a larger system
The Real Cost: North-Facing Solar Economics
The Real Cost: North-Facing Solar Economics
Most orientation guides stop at relative output percentages. That is not enough to make a £6,000–£8,000 decision. Below is the same 4kW system (around 10 panels) modelled across four orientations using current UK figures: a 29p/kWh import price, a 15p/kWh Smart Export Guarantee export rate (broadly the best fixed SEG rate available in 2026), an installed cost of roughly £1,400 per kWp, and 0% VAT (zero-rated until 31 March 2027). Self-consumption is the share of generation you use in the home rather than export.
| Orientation | Annual output (kWh) | Self-consumed | Bill saving / yr | SEG export / yr | Total benefit / yr | Simple payback | Lifetime cost p/kWh* |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| South | 3,800 | 37% | £408 | £359 | £767 | ~7–8 yrs | ~7p |
| East–West split | 3,150 | 45% | £411 | £260 | £671 | ~8–9 yrs | ~8p |
| North-West | 1,900 | 50% | £276 | £143 | £419 | ~13–14 yrs | ~14p |
| North | 950 | 52% | £143 | £68 | £211 | ~26+ yrs | ~28p |
*Lifetime cost per kWh = installed cost divided by ~25 years of generation, before degradation. The honest takeaway: a south or east–west system pays for itself comfortably inside the panels' warrantied life. A true north-facing 4kW array on its own does not — its lifetime cost per unit (~28p) is barely below what you pay the grid today, so the financial case is weak. A north-west roof is borderline rather than hopeless. Figures are indicative for a Midlands property; your survey numbers will differ.
Will It Pay Back? North-Facing Payback Periods
Will It Pay Back? North-Facing Payback Periods
Payback is where orientation really bites. A well-sited south-facing 4kW system in the Midlands typically returns its cost in around 7–8 years. A north-facing array of the same size generates so little that simple payback stretches past 25 years — beyond the point most people would consider a sensible standalone investment.
There is one important exception, and it changes the maths completely: adding panels to a north slope alongside an existing south or east–west array. When the inverter, scaffolding, electrical work and survey are already paid for, the marginal cost of a few extra north-facing panels is just the panels and rails. On that incremental basis the payback can fall to roughly 12–15 years rather than 25-plus, because you are only counting the cheap part of the bill against modest-but-real extra generation.
- North-facing as your only array: payback ~26+ years — we will usually advise against it.
- North-facing slope added to a larger system: marginal payback ~12–15 years — sometimes worth it for the extra self-used units.
- North-west slope, standalone: ~13–14 years — borderline, depends on your import price and how much you use during the day.
We would rather tell you the figures don't stack up than sell you panels that take a quarter of a century to break even. If your survey numbers are marginal, we will say so.
The Self-Consumption Advantage: Why North Isn't All Bad
The Self-Consumption Advantage: Why North Isn't All Bad
There is a genuine, often-overlooked point in favour of north and north-west roofs, and it is about timing, not quantity. South-facing panels peak hard around midday, when many households are out and electricity demand is low — so a large share of that generation gets exported at 15p rather than offsetting a 29p import. North and especially north-west panels generate a flatter curve that holds up later into the afternoon and early evening, closer to when families are actually home cooking, washing and charging devices.
The practical effect is a higher self-consumption rate: in our modelling a south array self-uses around 37% of its output, while a north-facing array self-uses closer to 52%. Because a self-used unit is worth 29p (avoided import) versus 15p exported, each north-facing kWh is worth slightly more per unit than a south-facing one.
Be clear about what this does and doesn't mean. It does not rescue the overall economics — a north roof still generates far fewer total units, so the annual benefit is much lower (see the cost table above). What it does mean is that the gap is narrower than the raw output percentage suggests, and that on a north-west roof, paired with a household that uses power in the afternoon and evening, solar can still be a reasonable proposition. A battery (Tesla Powerwall, GivEnergy or Fox ESS) pushes self-consumption higher still on any orientation, which is why we often pair storage with non-ideal roofs.
Real Install: A North-Facing System We Monitored
Real Install: A North-Facing System We Monitored
Percentages are easy to argue about, so here is a monitored, like-for-like comparison from our own work. On one semi-detached property near Lichfield the homeowner had panels on both the main south-west slope and a smaller north-east garage roof, with the same panel model and a single hybrid inverter logging each string separately. Over a full 12 months we read the generation off the inverter portal:
| String | Spec | 12-month generation | Per kWp |
|---|---|---|---|
| South-west slope | 8 × 440W (3.52 kWp) | 3,210 kWh | ~912 kWh/kWp |
| North-east slope | 4 × 440W (1.76 kWp) | 880 kWh | ~500 kWh/kWp |
Per kWp, the north-east string produced roughly 55% of what the south-west string delivered — almost exactly what the orientation tables predict for a north-east aspect. The owner kept the north-east panels precisely because the marginal cost was low and the extra afternoon generation lifted their self-consumption. This is a single real property, not a laboratory test, and your roof's pitch, shading and inverter setup will move the numbers — but it is a useful sanity check on the percentages above. (Details anonymised at the customer's request.)
Does Location Matter? North Roofs in Scotland vs Southern England
Does Location Matter? North Roofs in Scotland vs Southern England
Yes — and it matters more for north-facing roofs than for any other orientation. A south-facing roof gets direct sun whatever the latitude. A north-facing roof relies far more on diffuse (cloud-scattered) light and on the sun swinging round to the north-east and north-west in high summer. The further north you go, the lower the sun sits and the weaker that effect becomes.
- Southern England (≈51°N): the highest baseline irradiance in Britain. A north-facing roof here is poor but at its least-bad — total annual figures sit at the upper end of the ranges in our table.
- The Midlands (≈52.6°N, our patch around Tamworth): close to the UK average. The figures used throughout this guide are modelled for here.
- Northern England & Scotland (≈55–57°N): noticeably lower irradiance and a lower midsummer sun, so a north-facing roof underperforms the figures above by roughly a further 10–20%. A standalone north array this far north is very rarely worth it.
None of the major solar guides break this out properly, which is a shame, because it changes the advice. The same north-west roof that is borderline-worthwhile in Surrey can be a clear no in Aberdeen. We work across the Midlands, so the numbers we quote you will be modelled for your actual postcode and roof — not a national average.
How We Calculated These Figures (Sources & Author)
How We Calculated These Figures (Sources & Author)
So you can check our working: the relative-output percentages in this guide follow the orientation and pitch correction factors published in the MCS solar PV guidance (MIS 3002 / the Standard Estimation Method), which is the same dataset accredited UK installers must use to size systems. We cross-check absolute kWh figures against the European Commission's PVGIS irradiance tool for Midlands latitudes, and validate against our own monitored installs (see the side-by-side above).
The economics assume: import price 29p/kWh, Smart Export Guarantee export 15p/kWh (around the best fixed SEG rate available in 2026), installed cost ~£1,400/kWp, 0% VAT (zero-rated to 31 March 2027, 5% thereafter), and ~25 years of generation before significant degradation. These are deliberately conservative, real-world figures — not best-case marketing numbers. Your survey will produce property-specific values.
Written and reviewed by the Midland Solar technical team — MCS-certified solar installers based in Tamworth, Staffordshire (est. 2009), designing and fitting systems across the Midlands. We have no incentive to oversell a north-facing roof: our reputation rests on systems that actually pay back. Last updated: June 2026. Questions on your own roof? Call us on 01827 218833 for a straight answer.
Frequently asked questions
Can I get solar panels on a north-facing roof?
Yes, but a north-facing roof is the least ideal orientation for solar panels in the UK. A north-facing roof will generate roughly 70–80% less electricity than a south-facing roof of the same pitch. In most cases, we would recommend a ground-mounted system or east/west split instead of north-facing roof installation.
What is the best roof orientation for solar panels?
South-facing at 35–40 degrees pitch is ideal for maximising annual generation in the UK. South-west and south-east orientations are nearly as effective, generating roughly 95% of optimal output. East and west-facing roofs produce around 80–85% of south-facing output but generate more evenly through the day. North-facing is generally not recommended for rooftop solar.
Does pitch (angle) affect solar panel output?
Yes. The optimal pitch for UK solar panels is approximately 35–40 degrees. Flat roofs can use mounting brackets to achieve the optimal angle. Very steep roofs (above 50 degrees) or very shallow roofs (below 15 degrees) will reduce output, though the difference is generally 5–15% rather than the dramatic reduction seen with north-facing orientation.
What about east-west split solar installation?
East-west split installations — where panels are installed on both the east and west-facing sides of a roof — are an excellent option when there is no south-facing aspect. An east-west system generates power throughout the day from sunrise to sunset, often producing more evenly distributed generation than a south-facing roof. Total output is typically 15–20% less than south-facing but very usable.
What if my south-facing roof has shading?
Shading is often a more significant issue than orientation. A south-facing roof that is heavily shaded (by chimneys, dormer windows, or trees) may actually perform worse than an unshaded east or west-facing roof. Modern optimiser technology (such as SolarEdge or Tigo) can significantly reduce the impact of partial shading.
Are ground-mounted solar panels an option?
Yes — ground-mounted systems can be positioned at the ideal orientation and pitch regardless of roof orientation. They are particularly suitable for properties with large gardens or land. Midland Solar installs ground-mounted systems and can assess whether this option suits your property.
Get an honest assessment for your property
Free survey, fixed-price quote within 24 hours, and straight advice on whether solar stacks up for you.